By VABayNews Staff

In 2020, Virginia voters made a clear statement: they wanted to take redistricting out of the hands of partisan lawmakers. The constitutional amendment creating a bipartisan redistricting commission passed overwhelmingly, fueled by years of frustration over political maps drawn to protect incumbents rather than reflect communities.

Now, just six years later, that reform is back under pressure.

According to critics — including a Virginia Commonwealth University professor who has written extensively on gerrymandering — Democratic leaders are attempting to reverse course after new political realities left them dissatisfied with how independent maps reshaped the playing field.

The core accusation is straightforward: if you don’t like the outcome, change the rules.

The 2020 Promise

The 2020 amendment was sold as a structural safeguard. It created a bipartisan commission with equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans and included citizen members. The goal was to reduce overt partisan manipulation and restore public trust.

Voters approved it decisively.

The reform was framed not as a partisan victory, but as a democratic principle: politicians shouldn’t choose their voters. Voters should choose their politicians.

Now critics argue that principle is being tested.

What’s Being Proposed?

Opponents of the current amendment effort claim that Democratic leaders — including Gov. Abigail Spanberger, Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell, and Sen. Louise Lucas — support changes that would effectively give the legislature greater control over redistricting.

The concern from center-right voices is not merely partisan advantage, but precedent. If one party can discard an independent structure when it no longer benefits them, what stops the other party from doing the same when power shifts?

Redistricting is inherently political. But voters were told in 2020 that Virginia was moving beyond the worst forms of partisan map-drawing. Undoing that reform risks reopening old wounds.

The 10-1 Map Debate

Critics describe the current congressional landscape as a potential “10-1” outcome favoring Democrats, arguing that such an imbalance would not accurately reflect a state that still elects Republicans statewide and maintains competitive districts.

Democrats counter that Virginia has shifted politically and that the maps reflect demographic and voting trends, not manipulation.

That’s the crux of the debate.

Is this about correcting flawed structure — or correcting electoral outcomes?

A Broader Question About Process

Redistricting fights are rarely about abstract fairness alone. They are about power. But what makes this dispute unusual is the timing.

The 2020 reform was relatively recent. It was championed as a permanent structural improvement. Reversing it so soon risks signaling that “reform” only lasts as long as it produces preferred results.

For Virginia voters, especially independents who backed reform, the bigger issue may be consistency. Institutions gain legitimacy when rules endure beyond immediate advantage.

Why This Matters Beyond Virginia

Virginia has often positioned itself as a model for bipartisan governance in a polarized era. Its 2020 redistricting reform was cited nationally as a step toward depoliticizing elections.

If that structure is weakened, other states may take note.

Independent commissions only work if both parties accept unfavorable outcomes when they occur. The moment they become conditional, they cease being independent.

The April 21 Vote

Voters will ultimately decide whether to approve changes to the redistricting framework.

This isn’t just a vote about lines on a map. It’s a vote about whether structural reforms should be durable or disposable.

Virginia’s political future will always shift. That’s democracy. The question before voters is whether the guardrails meant to protect that democracy should shift just as easily.

For a state that overwhelmingly supported reform in 2020, the burden is now on lawmakers to explain why those same protections are suddenly inadequate.

If reform only lasts when it benefits the majority party, was it reform at all?

---

Support Independent Journalism

Virginia Bay News is part of the Bay News Media Network — a growing group of independent, reader-supported newsrooms covering government accountability, courts, public safety, and institutional failures across the country.

Support independent journalism that isn’t funded by political parties, corporations, or government agencies
Submit tips or documents securely — if you see something wrong, we want to know

Independent reporting only works when readers stay engaged. Your attention, tips, and support help keep these stories alive.